Part I The marked occurrences ...
Part I The marked occurrences onward June 10, 2003, the Court of Appeal of Ontario ruled: a) that same-sex unions must be part of the (federal) definition in succession marriage; b) that the existing definition of "the voluntary union of single man and one woman for life thereafter" is unconstitutional because it contradicts the equality clause ( 15) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; c) that the just discovered definition is the "voluntary union for life of sum of two units persons to the exclusion of all others;" d) that this definition is of immediate consequence (thereby bypassing both Parliament and an Appeal to Want to read the whole article? You can purchase it here. It's quick and easy.
|