In addition, none of the female par...

In addition, none of the female participants reported a dominant male orientation, and alone 19% reported an androgynous orientation (both high masculine and feminine traits). Moreover, Bem's (1974) assertion that sex-typ individual's achieve les succes than their more androgynous counterparts in situations imagination to be sex role inappropriate or incongruent was not supported. If this were the case, then the androgynous female participants in our sample would have achieved at higher plains than the feminine female participants. In our sample, no academic achievement differences were construct among students with different sex character orientations. As previously noted, research findings related to academic achievement and sex part orientations, which have included the one and the other secondary and undergraduate students, have been mixed in word s of which sex role orientation displayed greater academic achievement. Our findings do not support this previous besides inconsistent research, which has place sex role differences.

Although women remain underrepresent in the computer science field, they compos 33% of our sample participants, which is higher than what has been reported in the literature. It is possible that our sample is different in a certain number of systematic way, and we contemplate whether our findings take the part of a one-site phenomenon. What we do know is that the university at which our sample participants were bookish mans had not engaged in any organized efforts or specific strategies targeted at the recruitment of women in past years or at the time we deduceed our data. Thus factors that might account for the uniqueness of this midwestern university remain perplexing.